|
Member Review - bladewind : 08-Nov-2006 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.00 |
| Comment: |
Needs fluff and the timeline is far too wrong. Nobody ever ever uses Light Engine or Er mediums in the early 50s.
The armament is by no means a vast improvement.
Just straight upgrades do not make a mech good. It needs to be justified with fluff. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Sleeping Dragon : 13-Jul-2006 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.00 |
| Comment: |
This mech needs some fluff and a few explanations. Why it is built with Light engine and without ES (especially when the ES is standard on Cents since that 3050 piece of junk)? Standard engine and ES would give you an additional 0.5t, so with some armor removed you may get Artemis for the LRMs and that is a good investment, isn't it? Another thing needing explanation would be moving weapons around the mech. Is it necessary? I don't think so, but I don't want to count it as a design flaw, but still, I would like to hear why it was done. So with a few changes it would be okay (different year of production, fluff, ...) but as it stands it can't get more from me. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|