|
Mordel's Bar & Grill |
|
  |
» |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Marlboro
ComStar
Private, First Class
Joined: 11-Mar-2002 00:00
Posts: 25
|
 Posted: 11-Mar-2002 04:19 Post subject: Warships not effective? |
  |
|
Well I've actually been playing on and of against a few people using a hash of Aerotech and Battlespace.
Fasa Design=Totally ineffective and purposely gimped.
Custom Designs=Death and Destruction.
|
|
| Back to top |
 
|
Sir Henry
Team Bansai
Senior Tech Specialist
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 4899
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 11-Mar-2002 08:00 Post subject: Warships not effective? |
|
|
Welcome Back MM.
Sir HEnry
_________________
Sir Henry
A Dragon in the disguise of a bunny, is still a Dragon.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Marlboro
ComStar
Private, First Class
Joined: 11-Mar-2002 00:00
Posts: 25
|
| Posted: 12-Mar-2002 01:36 Post subject: Warships not effective? |
|
|
Feels good to be back. Got off on a EQ binge and after getting to the halfway point I have decided to go back to a balanced diet of gaming.
BTW whats the word on the new Tech Readout? Should be out by now I think.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
pinkfloyd214
ComStar
Sergeant
Joined: 14-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 141
|
| Posted: 12-Mar-2002 19:19 Post subject: Warships not effective? |
|
|
Quote:
|
On 2002-03-05 15:44, Vagabond wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2002-03-05 07:48, Sir Henry wrote:
Vagabond, Remind me never to serve with you, or Hire you.
Risking Civilians, the People who Pay you, is one of the stupidest Ideas I've heard come out of someone here, in a long time....Since mud's disarmament policy....
|
|
i knew this one was gonna get misunderstood. usually if you are commiting orbital bombardment. a] you not a merc n b] your usually the attacking force.
time again in war fair civi loses have happened.
hiroshima.
nagasaki.
berlin.
london.
to name a few. all of these attacks where deemed, militarily acceptible even thou there was most certainly going to be non combative looses.
it was with heavy hearts that soldiers launched these attacks. i know they didnt want to. hell i appor civi loses. there not the target.
but if you let an enemy capitalize on your inaction when there maybe civi loses. you giving them a safe place to hide, n rebuild.
and that would be a military blunder.
my personel doctrin is leave civis 0ut of it, and anybody that hides behind the bodies of humans. is a murdist bastard.
i was just stating the military acceptable lose theorium.
|
|
You also forgot Edo.
but as far as warship being ineffective, well lets put it like this, if your enemy has them you need them. if you are doing an orbital bombarament you really don't care about the people down there. it's not like the Ares Convention hasn't been broken before.
Aslian (i don't think i spelled it right) when you had those regiments trying to reclaim that planet from the Ghost Bears (HAH), I think the warship did it's job in crushing the invasion before it started. that right there is an awesome arguement in it self.
[ This Message was edited by: pinkfloyd214 on 2002-03-12 19:20 ]
_________________
Click- tech is for sissies
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Sir Henry
Team Bansai
Senior Tech Specialist
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 4899
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 12-Mar-2002 19:23 Post subject: Warships not effective? |
|
|
M.A.D. Mutually assured destruction.
Sir Henry
_________________
Sir Henry
A Dragon in the disguise of a bunny, is still a Dragon.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Gunslinger Patch
Royal Black Watch Regiment
Major
Joined: 04-Mar-2002 00:00
Posts: 1611
|
| Posted: 16-Mar-2002 01:02 Post subject: Warships not effective? |
|
|
M.A.D. happens when both sides are capable of wiping out the other side regardless of whether that other side can wipe out the first side too.
But going by the sourcebooks House Marik (and perhaps WOB in the bargain?) can and will build a Navy that can wipe out the other side long before any one opponent or even an alliance (unlikely what with the Fedcom civil war and the Ghost Bear V. Draconis Combine mild dispute) could do the same to the FWL in return.
I guess the Mariks are aiming for O.S.A.D.
One sided assured destruction.
_________________
"Those who beat their guns into plows will plow for those with guns..." -Thomas Jefferson
|
|
| Back to top |
|
chihawk
Clan Blood Spirit
Master Bartender
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 8050
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 16-Mar-2002 09:32 Post subject: Warships not effective? |
|
|
Quote:
|
On 2002-03-16 01:02, Gunslinger Patch wrote:
I guess the Mariks are aiming for O.S.A.D.
One sided assured destruction.
|
|
Isn't that the definition of war? 
_________________
www.210sportsblog.com
|
|
| Back to top |
 
|
|
|
| |
» |
All times are GMT-04:00 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
