|
Mordel's Bar & Grill |
|
  |
» |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Captain_Frosty
ComStar
Corporal
Joined: 22-Nov-2024 02:18
Posts: 55
Location: Greece
|
 Posted: 28-Apr-2025 03:49 Post subject: Why is infantry so weird? |
  |
|
Personally, I've always loved the combined arms warfare aspect of battletech. While 'mechs have always been the centerpiece of the setting and system, the fact is that you can easily have a fully competent lance of vehicles or even an augmented lance of both 'mechs and vehicles.
Aerospace fighters and dropships are also interesting and fun while small craft and warships are fittingly impressive in their extensive loadouts. Everything feels fairly well rounded and while not perfectly balanced or realistic, I'd say every level of combat feels satisfying...
And then there's infantry.
To clarify, I'm not saying infantry should be a match for 'mechs. Even if you somehow make an infantry platoon that costs as much BV as a 'mech, it should still operate like infantry. That means they are squishy, relatively slow compared to vehicles but can hide well and use any environment to their advantage.
What I have an issue with are infantry weapons. Not even the rules but specifically the weapon listings themselves; they feel completely nonsensical and thoroughly inconsistent with the rest of the system.
Of course, I'm not saying that something like a crossbow should be "balanced" with a laser rifle but at the same time, it feels like there's only 3~5 primary weapons and 1~3 support weapons that are worth it at all.
A 300kg heavy support laser has more range and only 0.09 less damage than a 1800kg support PPC that physically slows down the infantry platoon due to its weight. Not only that but the BV difference does not at all justify this massive difference either so its not a mechanics balance thing; it's just weird.
Similarly, the core rulebook has "LRM infantry" as an example default template and then I only really see a single instance of a support LRM launcher in Tech Manual which has poor range, was made in the 3050s and can't even target aircraft.
I apologize if this comes off as a rant. I just always like using infantry in any strategy game I play and it sadly feels like there's only 2 ways to do so effectively in BT; give them field guns or make them cheap and highly mobile to rush swarm attacks against 'mechs like it's 1942 in Stalingrad.
Am I the idiot here? I've misunderstood rules before, severely so in the case of ECMs at one point, but I'm fairly sure I've not misinterpreted infantry functionality and it just feels completely wrong compared to the rest of the game. Ironically, it feels like Protomechs work the way that I'd expect/want infantry to function.
|
|
| Back to top |
 
|
Thunder
Clan Blood Spirit
Star Colonel
Joined: 22-Feb-2024 01:39
Posts: 416
|
| Posted: 28-Apr-2025 07:34 Post subject: Why is infantry so weird? |
|
|
| Infantry weapons are weird because they're converted from RPG stats.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| |
» |
All times are GMT-04:00 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
