| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jymset
Scavenger
in pursuit of LosTech
Joined: 05-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 956
Location: Germany
|
 Posted: 18-Dec-2004 11:55 Post subject: 3025: Which 55-tonner do you prefer? |
  |
|
Here is the next set of 'mechs.
Chihawk, once again, I'm only putting up the ones that have 5 or more choices, I hope you don't consider that spamming....
_________________
"Rear armour is defeatist!" - unknown Kuritan Mechwarrior
The AC5 is a great gun!
On heat, 3025 style:
A Rifleman knows no heat.
|
|
| Back to top |
  
|
jymset
Scavenger
in pursuit of LosTech
Joined: 05-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 956
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: 18-Dec-2004 11:57 Post subject: RE: 3025: Which 55-tonner do you prefer? |
|
|
I voted the Wolverine. We had this debate recently, so I won't go into it, but to sum up: I think it is the most versatile. Best punch at close ranges, best armour (-allocation), equal best mobility, best heat-dissipation (doesn't overheat as 3 other designs, and isn't over-sinked like the Hawk).
Is the 2nd best looking, too (after the Shadowhawk).
_________________
"Rear armour is defeatist!" - unknown Kuritan Mechwarrior
The AC5 is a great gun!
On heat, 3025 style:
A Rifleman knows no heat.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Paul
Capellan Confederation
Sang-wei
Joined: 25-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 255
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 18-Dec-2004 12:23 Post subject: RE: 3025: Which 55-tonner do you prefer? |
|
|
Griffin. I've done unholy amounts of damage with these. It constantly surprises me with how long it lasts, and how much pain it can inflict.
Also like the Wolverine, but I really prefer the Marik variant. Only voting based on the standard config written up in 3025.
Paul
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Ruger
Lyran Alliance
Hauptmann General
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 1915
|
| Posted: 18-Dec-2004 13:19 Post subject: RE: 3025: Which 55-tonner do you prefer? |
|
|
The problem with this category is that I have three loves in it...the Wolverine, the Griffin, and the Dervish...of them all, however, I think the Wolverine is the best rounded...I love the Dervish for its barrage potential and its ability to work with a group....the Griffin has great mobility while packing that PPC, but that Wolverine has the heat dissipation the others lack, and a great weapons loadout...and if you go by the fluff, its comm system is second to none...
Ruger
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Nightmare
Lyran Alliance
Kommandant-General
Joined: 03-May-2002 00:00
Posts: 2214
|
| Posted: 18-Dec-2004 13:49 Post subject: RE: 3025: Which 55-tonner do you prefer? |
|
|
Wolverines are always nasty customers, even in this august company. I'd pick the Wolverine first, then pair it with a Griffin. That's an unholy mix of ranges in a pair of mechs.
_________________
A tree fall in the forest, and no one is around, and it hits a mime. Does anyone care?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Vagabond
Mercenary
Mr. Referee
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 5646
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 18-Dec-2004 16:54 Post subject: RE: 3025: Which 55-tonner do you prefer? |
|
|
dervish. its my mech.
_________________
one must work hard to cultivate the mind and body. and one must always cultivate the mind.
//^(^_^)^\\
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Stinger
The Knights of Chaos
General
Joined: 30-Apr-2002 00:00
Posts: 1833
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 18-Dec-2004 20:12 Post subject: RE: 3025: Which 55-tonner do you prefer? |
|
|
Well I had to vote shadowhawk. It has been my favorite in terms of looks since I started playing (tied with the Stinger, Battlemaster, P-hawk, Clint and Awesome). It also gets better with a few weapon swaps.
But since I am viewing this poll on asthetics then I have to vote with my heart. 
So shadowhawk all the way!
_________________
Stinger
If it's "creepy" to use the Internet, military satellites, and robot aircraft to find a house full of gorgeous young models so I can drop in on them unexpected, then FINE, I'm "creepy". Howard Wolowitz. BBT.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
cain
Blighted Sun Battalion
1st Company
"Ralgith's Renegades"
Lieutenant
Joined: 10-May-2004 00:00
Posts: 329
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: 19-Dec-2004 15:13 Post subject: RE: 3025: Which 55-tonner do you prefer? |
|
|
i must say the dervish it dos oveheat alot but it can be very effective
plus i reckon it looks *£$^-hot
_________________
Nothing is as good as it looks and rarely looks as good as it isAnything that can go wrong will go wrong :Murphy
|
|
| Back to top |
|
mud
Draconis Combine
Tai-sho
Joined: 23-Jul-2002 00:00
Posts: 1618
|
| Posted: 19-Dec-2004 15:32 Post subject: RE: 3025: Which 55-tonner do you prefer? |
|
|
I'm a recent convert to the Dervish; the paired LRM launchers give it a very nice long-range punch, and it's backup weapons are not bad either. The only drawback is the light armor, but if you keep the enemy at arm's length and wear him down with your LRMs you can compensate for that.
You can also scrap a ton of the SRM ammo for a ton of armor.
[ This Message was edited by: mud on 2004-12-19 15:33 ]
_________________
"The enemy's gate is down."
|
|
| Back to top |
|
bandit
Clan Nova Cat
Star Colonel
Joined: 21-Sep-2002 00:00
Posts: 474
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: 20-Dec-2004 08:00 Post subject: RE: 3025: Which 55-tonner do you prefer? |
|
|
| I say Griffin.No close range weapon,than punch and kick
|
|
| Back to top |
|
StarRaven
Federated Suns
Leftenant General
Joined: 01-Jun-2004 00:00
Posts: 1138
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 20-Dec-2004 12:46 Post subject: RE: 3025: Which 55-tonner do you prefer? |
|
|
Dervish. The light armor does hurt, but the weapons help make up for it. Only the Scorpian has a better weapons load, but its armor is even lighter.
_________________
"Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close semblance to the first."
- Attributed to General Aleksandr Kerensky
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Seraph
Blighted Sun Battalion
2nd Company
"Seraph's Slaughter"
Major
Joined: 11-Mar-2004 00:00
Posts: 1744
|
| Posted: 25-Dec-2004 07:52 Post subject: RE: 3025: Which 55-tonner do you prefer? |
|
|
I love quads. So I voted Scorpion. Similar to the Griffin in weapons load but with no minimums to worry about. Is faster but doesn't jump, though it has movement characteristics all it's own.
On a side note: the fluff says that while it's a rough ride it can still travel at running speeds after losing two legs. I know the rules state that such is not allowed but I have always allowed fluff based rule changes in my campaigns. I feel it brings out the individuality of the mechs used and all my players I have ever played with have agrreed to do the same.
_________________
If ignorance is bliss, then why are you so miserable?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
bladewind
Free Rasalhague Republic
Major General
Joined: 02-Oct-2004 00:00
Posts: 1054
Location: Singapore
|
| Posted: 13-Jan-2005 23:38 Post subject: RE: 3025: Which 55-tonner do you prefer? |
|
|
| Dervish, i always had a thing for mechs with missile racks.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Wanallo
Federated Suns
Leftenant Colonel
Joined: 02-Jan-2004 00:00
Posts: 671
Location: United Kingdom
|
| Posted: 14-Jan-2005 02:17 Post subject: RE: 3025: Which 55-tonner do you prefer? |
|
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-01-13 23:38, bladewind wrote:
Dervish, i always had a thing for mechs with missile racks.
|
|
And Autocannons, in my case, just seem to have a nice image in my head of an autocannon ripping through a mech.
_________________
Constant exposure to dangers will breed contempt for them-Seneca
|
|
| Back to top |
|
drfunk
Draconis Combine
Kashira
Joined: 14-Mar-2004 00:00
Posts: 156
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: 14-Jan-2005 03:09 Post subject: RE: 3025: Which 55-tonner do you prefer? |
|
|
I like the griffin just because it served me very well until the head got blown off. luckily my character made his piloting skill check. BUt he did mange to get a brtand new one but that's another story. 
_________________
A wise man speaks because he has something to say. A fool speaks because he must say something.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
