| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mekkatgirls
Magistracy of Canopus
Commander
Joined: 11-Dec-2023 02:15
Posts: 706
Location: United States
|
 Posted: 05-Jul-2024 00:07 Post subject: Hercules HRC-LS-9009 |
  |
|
| TRO: | BattleMech Technical Readout
Name/Model: Hercules HRC-LS-9009
Designer: mekkatgirls
Source(s): Custom Mordel.Net Units
Technology: Inner Sphere
Technology Rating: E
Tonnage: 70
Role: Brawler
Configuration: Biped BattleMech
Era/Year: Jihad / 3080
Rules (Current): Standard
Rules (Era): Advanced
Rules (Year): Advanced
Total Cost: 16,574,887 C-Bills
Battle Value: 1,657
Chassis: Northrup-502
Power Plant: Magna 350 XL
Walking Speed: 54 kph
Maximum Speed: 86.4 kph
Jump Jets: None
Jump Capacity: None
Armor: Aldis Heavy Ferro-Fibrous Ferro-Fibrous with CASE II
Armament:
1 Fusigon Model XI ER PPC
1 Imperator Code Red LB 10-X AC
2 Aberdovey Medium Pulse Lasers
2 Martell Small Pulse Lasers
Manufacturer: Kali Yama Weapons Industries
Primary Factory: Unknown
Communications: Irian Orator-5K
Targeting & Tracking: Irian 511
================================================================================================
Overview:
The newer variant of the Hercules battlemech.
================================================================================================
Equipment Mass
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Internal Structure: Standard 7.00
Engine: 350 XL 15.00
Walking MP: 5
Running MP: 8
Jumping MP: 0
Heat Sinks (Double): 11 [22] 1.00
Gyro: Standard 4.00
Cockpit: Standard 3.00
Armor Factor: 215 12.00
Type: Ferro-Fibrous
Internal Armor
Structure Value
Head: 3 9
Center Torso: 22 34
Center Torso (rear): 10
R/L Torso: 15 24
R/L Torso (rear): 6
R/L Arm: 11 22
R/L Leg: 15 29
================================================================================================
Weapons and Ammo Location Critical Tonnage
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Medium Pulse Laser RT 1 2.00
Small Pulse Laser RT (R) 1 1.00
TAG RT 1 1.00
ER PPC LT 3 7.00
Small Pulse Laser LT (R) 1 1.00
Medium Pulse Laser RA 1 2.00
CASE II LA 1 1.00
LB 10-X AC LA 6 11.00
LB 10-X AC (Ammo 10) LA 1 1.00
LB 10-X AC (Ammo 10) [Cluster] LA 1 1.00
================================================================================================
Alpha Strike Statistics
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Value (PV): 38
TP: BM, SZ: 3, TMM: 2, MV: 10"
Damage: (S) 3 / (M) 3 / (L) 2, OV: 0
Armor (A): 7, Structure (S): 3
Specials: CASEII, FLK1/1/1, REAR1/-/-, TAG
|
|
|
| Back to top |
 
|
Ruger
Lyran Alliance
Kommandant-General
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 2549
|
| Posted: 05-Jul-2024 03:49 Post subject: Hercules HRC-LS-9009 |
|
|
I e always rather liked the Hercules (but don’t care for the mini I have).
I also like this version.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
mekkatgirls
Magistracy of Canopus
Commander
Joined: 11-Dec-2023 02:15
Posts: 706
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 05-Jul-2024 16:18 Post subject: Hercules HRC-LS-9009 |
|
|
| Do you think the IS anti-missile system is bad?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Ruger
Lyran Alliance
Kommandant-General
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 2549
|
| Posted: 05-Jul-2024 17:56 Post subject: Hercules HRC-LS-9009 |
|
|
| Maybe not as effective as the clan one, but I wouldn’t really call it bad.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
mekkatgirls
Magistracy of Canopus
Commander
Joined: 11-Dec-2023 02:15
Posts: 706
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 06-Jul-2024 17:01 Post subject: Hercules HRC-LS-9009 |
|
|
| do you think the laser anti-missile system is better or just runs to hot?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Ruger
Lyran Alliance
Kommandant-General
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 2549
|
| Posted: 06-Jul-2024 17:46 Post subject: Hercules HRC-LS-9009 |
|
|
If mounted on a vehicle, the regular system is probably better, since you don’t have to worry about any possible extra heat sinks and/or power amplifiers.
Then again, if it’s your only energy weapon or any additional ones just consume what heat sinks come in a fusion core, who cares about that?
On a ‘Mech or aerospace fighter or DropShip/WarShip, heat sinks are likely less of a concern. In this case, the LAMS is probably the better choice.
But, YMMV.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
