|
Member Review : 09-Sep-2025 10:40 |
|
|
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
HawkWolf HWK-5F |
| Rating: |
4.00 |
| Comment: |
Hawkwolf is just one of those designs I like. And this is a completely normal variant of it. I fully approve. Just wish there was at least some fluff explaining why or how it came to be. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 09-May-2025 19:23 |
|
|
1 out of 1 users (100.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Champion CHM-P1N |
| Rating: |
5.00 |
| Comment: |
I found the shenanigans involved with the movement profile to be suprising and funny. Very important traits IMO. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 30-Apr-2025 01:23 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Praetorian PRN-1H |
| Rating: |
5.00 |
| Comment: |
I think this one is kinda asking for a cheaper variant with a standard engine and an AC-10.
The fluff is what sells the mech. Makes it a "I can see them doing that" design. And then it does a good job at the thing its supposed to do. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 29-Apr-2025 01:51 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Never Out NO1-? |
| Rating: |
5.00 |
| Comment: |
Ah yes... infinite repeaters.
And the fact that you even attempted actual fluff for a silly design is worth bonus points.
Interestingly enough... I carry an even greater ratio of ammo to gun for my naval PDS. But warships have the tonnage to spare. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 29-Apr-2025 01:16 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Malus ("Project Far Cry") M41-US |
| Rating: |
3.50 |
| Comment: |
Could use a command console, and there is enough slack you could fit one. Armored cockpit, ppc capacitor, and downgrading the angel ecm and case. And then you'd have the trifecta of ghost targets. Or all the initiative bonuses. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 29-Apr-2025 01:02 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Valus ("Project SOTC") VLS-04 |
| Rating: |
4.00 |
| Comment: |
It feels undergunned but... between the Tcom, capacitor, and extea utility from the RAMS, it does settle into a decent package. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 29-Apr-2025 00:55 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Gaius ("Project Turok") GIS-8A |
| Rating: |
4.00 |
| Comment: |
Its a basic workhorse, with questionable upgrades. The turret and capacitor are the bits that stand out. The turret probably doesnt offer enough general utility for its tonnage. The capacitor adds vulnerability to a design that feels like it wants to focus on reliability |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 24-Apr-2025 08:16 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Lancer LN-2 |
| Rating: |
5.00 |
| Comment: |
I have use for something like this. As such its a good idea. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 19-Apr-2025 09:53 |
|
|
1 out of 1 users (100.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Tanto TTO-1N |
| Rating: |
4.50 |
| Comment: |
This mech makes me irrationally angry. So its probably doing its intended job. The iOS MRM's are of course a terrible idea that should be replaced by rocket launchers. But maybe thats the point, so what should be a flaw makes it unique instead. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 19-Apr-2025 09:50 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Ironwall (Jakal) Prime |
| Rating: |
4.00 |
| Comment: |
LBx with the Tcom is a choice. My current preferences would run towards an Ultra-10 instead. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
