|
|
|
Mordel's Bar & Grill |
|
  |
» |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ralgith
Blighted Sun Battalion
1st Company
"Ralgith's Renegades"
Colonel
Joined: 18-Aug-2003 00:00
Posts: 2021
Location: United States
|
 Posted: 25-Feb-2009 12:50 Post subject: Funny As Hell - 1986 Mac Plus vs. Modern AMD Dual Core |
  |
|
This is pretty damned funny, I got a good laugh
Original Source
The Most Outlandish Computer Comparison Ever!
Bloat. If you think that Americans are getting fatter, take one good look at the operating system (OS) your computer is running right now. It gets larger and more weighed down with every update. We are in the third decade of global personal computing, and have we really progressed that far?
Let's go back to the dawn of personal computing and grab an old sentimental favorite, the Apple Macintosh Plus. The Mac Plus is an icon of the '80s along with padded shoulders, big hair and Devo. It seems that we all had a little Mac, either in our college dorm room, in the upstairs bedroom, or on our office desk at some time. With its tiny 9-inch black & white screen and all-in-one packaging, the Mac Plus is a computing relic in the days of widescreen LCD monitors and dual- and quad-core systems.
However, to run these state-of-the-art PCs, we need to install one of the latest OSs. And that's where we run into trouble. Most people today have either Windows XP or Vista on their PCs. These OSs are modern, possess virtually infinite capacities and can run any of the most modern software. With the greater functionality comes size.
The Comparison
The generally recommended configuration for a Mac Plus is System 6.0.8. This is an OS that needs a legitimate minimum of 1 megabyte of RAM to be able to multitask, connect to a network, print, display WYSIWYG in millions of colours (on modular Macs), as well as run a reasonable GUI. Those are functions that usually require at least 500 times more memory under Windows XP and 1,000 times more memory under Windows Vista.
When we look at OS hard disk requirements, we find similar discrepancies. System 6.0.8 requires 1MB, Windows XP requires 1.5GB and Windows Vista 15GB. Yes, Vista needs 15,000 times the hard disk space as System 6.0.8. In simple text format, you can write 175,000 words in one megabyte which is the size of System 6.0.8. That works out to about two full-length novels. Windows Vista demands enough real estate on your hard drive that you could easily fit 30,000 full-length novels into it.
System 6.0.8 is not only a lot more compact since it has far fewer (mostly useless) features and therefore less code to process, but also because it was written in assembly code instead of the higher level language C. The lower the level of the code language, the less processing cycles are required to get something done.
The Mac Plus has a Motorola 68000 CPU running at 8MHz. The AMD has an Athlon 64 X2 4800+ with two cores, each running at 2.4GHz. In absolute computing power exclusively measured in processor speed, AMD's combined 4.8GHz is 600 times faster than the Motorola. However, the AMD is a far more advanced processor, thus performs in conventional benchmarks much faster than the old 68000 per Mhz. So it's very safe to say that the AMD is at least 1,000 times faster than the Mac Plus.
We decided to splurge and fit the maximum possible 4MB RAM into the old Plus. After all it was going up against AMD with its 2x512MB RAM for a total of 1,024MB or 1GB. That's about 250 times more memory than the Mac.
The Mac was fitted with an external SCSI 40MB Hard Drive. The AMD had an internal IDE 120GB Hard Drive with a 3,000 times greater data capacity. Both drives were under 10% filled.
The Tests
In order to keep the hoots and hollers of "unfair comparison" at a minimum, we designed the tests to be as fair and equitable as possible. There was no point running PCMark or Sandra Sisoft-type benchmarks on the two computers as the AMD would have the Mac for lunch. We focussed on running tests that reflect how the user perceives the computing experience. After all, most users don't know or care whether their computer has a 65nm dual-core CPU or a tiny midget wizard squatting in their cases. All they care about is how it works and how quickly it does the tasks we most often ask it to do. And no, we didn't include processing-heavy modern software like Photoshop or Crysis! We selected very basic everyday functions that were performed equally by the 1980's and the 2007 Microsoft applications.
Since the tests involve both different computers and different versions of software, it was important to design the tests to have as much consistency as possible.
1) Test timings were performed by a single person.
2) All of the tests were performed on the latest and most effective OS configuration. For the Mac Plus, that was System 6.0.8. For the AMD that was Windows XP Professional SP2.
3) All of the tests were performed with a generally recommended amount of RAM for the OS configuration. For the Mac Plus, that was 4MB. For the AMD that was 1GB.
4) All of the tests were done on original spec systems, therefore the hard disks were freshly formatted, the OSs just installed and no third party software beyond the standard Apple and Microsoft installations.
5) All of the tests were performed with only that single application open. Nothing but background and OS tasks that are part of a standard install of either OSs were running. The computers were not connected to the Internet or a LAN.
6) All of the tests were measured to within 0.1 second.
7) Each tests was performed at least three times per test per machine and the times averaged out.
The tests themselves went off flawlessly. Neither computer crashed or misbehaved in any way. They just did what they were asked, regardless of the technolgical advancements (or lack thereof) inside the case.
We didn't try any Web Surfing since the only browsers that are supposed to work well on the Mac Plus are Mozilla 1.2.1, Mozilla 1.3.1 and early versions of WannaBe and iCab. We thought that surfing the net on a b&w 9” screen would be a bit of a bummer, so we skipped it. However, there are some die-hard enthusiasts that are doing just that!
Then again there were various ways, including the Power R Video Driver Cable and various external dongles, which would let you connect all sorts of large external monitors to the Mac Plus. I remember lugging huge 80 lb. Ikegami 24” b&w monitors up and down stairs as they were the preferred screens for the later compact Macs like the SEs an SE/30s of publishing art departments around 1990. The photo of the monitor here is of a Hitachi 21” which was the biggest one I could find. Just picture that the Ikegamis were much bigger even than this monster! I guess that's why I still have a bad back!
We ran a variety of tests on two major software applications. The AMD got Word and Excel from Microsoft Office 2007. The Mac Plus got Word 3.01 and Excel 1.5. Yes, we know that these software versions were released one and two years respectively after the 1986 Mac Plus. But we just couldn't bring ourselves to run the earlier and hopelessly buggy versions.
Microsoft Word
Microsoft Word is the single software application most often used by people around the world. The tests that hold the greatest relevance to everyday office and personal use of Word are the most basic ones: Application Launch, Find & Replace, Open File, Pasting, Saving, Scrolling, Typing and Word Count.
Microsoft Excel
With Excel, we concentrated again on the most repetitive and common tasks. We chose: Application Launch, Arrange Windows, Autoformat, Fill Range, In-Cell Editing, Scroll Vertical, Subtotals and Zoom Out. Most users use relatively small spreadsheets so we used a 640 filled-cell format.
Time To Boot
Just for fun, we thought we'd throw in a Boot timing as well, just to see how long the OS takes from the time the button is pushed until the desktop is ready to use.
Conclusion
Check out the results! For the functions that people use most often, the 1986 vintage Mac Plus beats the 2007 AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+: 9 tests to 8! Out of the 17 tests, the antique Mac won 53% of the time! Including a jaw-dropping 52 second whipping of the AMD from the time the Power button is pushed to the time the Desktop is up and useable.
We also didn't want to overly embarrass the AMD by comparing the time it takes to install the OS vs. the old Mac. The Mac's average of about a minute is dwarfed by the approximately one hour install time of Windows XP Pro.
Is this to say that the Mac Plus is a better computer than the AMD? Of course not. The technological advancements of 21 years have placed modern PCs in a completely different league of varied capacities. But the "User Experience" has not changed much in two decades. Due to bloated code that has to incorporate hundreds of functions that average users don't even know exist, let alone ever utilize, the software companies have weighed down our PCs to effectively neutralize their vast speed advantages. When we compare strictly common, everyday, basic user tasks between the Mac Plus and the AMD we find remarkable similarities in overall speed, thus it can be stated that for the majority of simple office uses, the massive advances in technology in the past two decades have brought zero advance in productivity.
And that's just plain crazy.
_________________
Colonel Ralgith t'Mayasara
Blighted Sun Battalion
1st Company 'Ralgith's Renegades'
|
|
| Back to top |
   
|
Sir Henry
Team Bansai
Senior Tech Specialist
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 4899
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 27-Feb-2009 09:17 Post subject: Funny As Hell - 1986 Mac Plus vs. Modern AMD Dual Core |
|
|
I guess the comparison was not so far fetched, now is it....
_________________
Sir Henry
A Dragon in the disguise of a bunny, is still a Dragon.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
ralgith
Blighted Sun Battalion
1st Company
"Ralgith's Renegades"
Colonel
Joined: 18-Aug-2003 00:00
Posts: 2021
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 28-Feb-2009 18:51 Post subject: Funny As Hell - 1986 Mac Plus vs. Modern AMD Dual Core |
|
|
Kinda disturbing though.
_________________
Colonel Ralgith t'Mayasara
Blighted Sun Battalion
1st Company 'Ralgith's Renegades'
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Mordel
Mordel.Net
Administrator
Joined: 03-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 6017
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 01-Mar-2009 23:15 Post subject: Funny As Hell - 1986 Mac Plus vs. Modern AMD Dual Core |
|
|
Let's see how well the old Mac Plus plays Diablo II
_________________
Mordel Blacknight - Site Administrator
|
|
| Back to top |
  
|
chihawk
Clan Blood Spirit
Master Bartender
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 8050
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 02-Mar-2009 15:20 Post subject: Funny As Hell - 1986 Mac Plus vs. Modern AMD Dual Core |
|
|
_________________
www.210sportsblog.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Sleeping Dragon
Draconis Combine
Tai-i
Joined: 06-Apr-2005 00:00
Posts: 4820
Location: Czech Republic
|
| Posted: 03-Mar-2009 13:45 Post subject: Funny As Hell - 1986 Mac Plus vs. Modern AMD Dual Core |
|
|
Ooooooh! This looks so iATTRACTIVE!
_________________
The dragon NEVER sleeps!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Sir Henry
Team Bansai
Senior Tech Specialist
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 4899
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 09-Mar-2009 11:34 Post subject: Funny As Hell - 1986 Mac Plus vs. Modern AMD Dual Core |
|
|
_________________
Sir Henry
A Dragon in the disguise of a bunny, is still a Dragon.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
MEX
Clan Blood Spirit
Star Colonel
Joined: 21-Mar-2002 00:00
Posts: 440
Location: Austria
|
| Posted: 22-Mar-2009 08:34 Post subject: Re: Funny As Hell - 1986 Mac Plus vs. Modern AMD Dual Core |
|
|
Dear Mordel,
if you only want to PLAY with your computer, you better compare your PC with a next-gen console like the PS3 or Xbox ( the Wii is a last-gen console similar to the Mac in this test  )
MfG, MEX
PS: I too have a old Mac SE 1/40
|
|
| Back to top |
|
chihawk
Clan Blood Spirit
Master Bartender
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 8050
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 08-May-2009 15:55 Post subject: Funny As Hell - 1986 Mac Plus vs. Modern AMD Dual Core |
|
|
Yet another reason why Macs need security
| wrote: | As expected, my blog this week about Macintosh security generated a lot of comments. Some were personal in nature (author's note: I really do know the difference between a Trojan and a virus but typos happen), some were quite thought-provoking.
I did receive some interesting data from a colleague from IBM. According to the X-Force 2008 Trend & Risk Report (PDF) released early this year, Mac OS X Server and Mac OS X top the list of operating systems with the most disclosed vulnerabilities for 2008. Each accounts for 14.3 percent, and has been in the top five in each of the last three years. Rounding out the top five were: Linux Kernel at 10.9 percent, Sun Solaris at 7.3 percent, and Microsoft Windows XP at 5.5 percent.
The purpose of this data is to compare the total number of disclosed vulnerabilities with each individual operating system. Vulnerability data is submitted to the Mitre Corp. and then appears in the CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) List.
This is not a perfect study as there are common vulnerabilities across different operating systems. Additionally, the Windows-based total vulnerability "footprint" is much larger than the Mac because of the size of the Windows installed base. Finally, this is a cumulative study but the data does not break down the vulnerabilities in terms of how critical they are. All that said, the X-Force data puts the whole "Mac is secure and Windows is not" discussion in perspective with some real numbers. I don't think IBM has an ax to grind here.
Again, I am not trying to pick a fight with Mac users or cast aspersions on Apple. My point is that OS X, Windows, Oracle, etc., are complicated pieces of software with known (and unknown) security holes. Clearly Windows is the biggest target but the Mac installed base is too juicy and exposed for the cyber bad guys to ignore. The X-Force data is yet another reason why Apple users shouldn't consider themselves immune. Apple itself has said as much, suggesting indeed that Mac users install antivirus software.
This line of reasoning seems to stir massive passion, anger, and antipathy in the Apple community, but is risk management really that bad?
|
_________________
www.210sportsblog.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
ralgith
Blighted Sun Battalion
1st Company
"Ralgith's Renegades"
Colonel
Joined: 18-Aug-2003 00:00
Posts: 2021
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 08-May-2009 19:09 Post subject: Funny As Hell - 1986 Mac Plus vs. Modern AMD Dual Core |
|
|
He fails to mention that it also doesn't take into consideration how quickly the vulnerabilities are corrected. Linux may have a pretty high percentage, but they are usually minor, and fixed quickly. Whereas Windows, they're usually major, and fixed slowly. I can't comment in regards to Macs, since I don't, and never will, own any.
_________________
Colonel Ralgith t'Mayasara
Blighted Sun Battalion
1st Company 'Ralgith's Renegades'
|
|
| Back to top |
|
chihawk
Clan Blood Spirit
Master Bartender
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 8050
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 08-May-2009 22:18 Post subject: Re: Funny As Hell - 1986 Mac Plus vs. Modern AMD Dual Core |
|
|
| ralgith wrote: | | He fails to mention that it also doesn't take into consideration how quickly the vulnerabilities are corrected. Linux may have a pretty high percentage, but they are usually minor, and fixed quickly. Whereas Windows, they're usually major, and fixed slowly. I can't comment in regards to Macs, since I don't, and never will, own any. |
Click links for answers...
_________________
www.210sportsblog.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
ralgith
Blighted Sun Battalion
1st Company
"Ralgith's Renegades"
Colonel
Joined: 18-Aug-2003 00:00
Posts: 2021
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 09-May-2009 11:29 Post subject: Re: Funny As Hell - 1986 Mac Plus vs. Modern AMD Dual Core |
|
|
| chihawk wrote: | | ralgith wrote: | | He fails to mention that it also doesn't take into consideration how quickly the vulnerabilities are corrected. Linux may have a pretty high percentage, but they are usually minor, and fixed quickly. Whereas Windows, they're usually major, and fixed slowly. I can't comment in regards to Macs, since I don't, and never will, own any. |
Click links for answers... |
Too lazy 
_________________
Colonel Ralgith t'Mayasara
Blighted Sun Battalion
1st Company 'Ralgith's Renegades'
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Sir Henry
Team Bansai
Senior Tech Specialist
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 4899
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 11-May-2009 09:24 Post subject: Funny As Hell - 1986 Mac Plus vs. Modern AMD Dual Core |
|
|
I own all three. Windows, Mac and Linux...
They all have their advantages and disadvantages...
_________________
Sir Henry
A Dragon in the disguise of a bunny, is still a Dragon.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
MEX
Clan Blood Spirit
Star Colonel
Joined: 21-Mar-2002 00:00
Posts: 440
Location: Austria
|
| Posted: 11-May-2009 09:49 Post subject: Re: Funny As Hell - 1986 Mac Plus vs. Modern AMD Dual Core |
|
|
| Sir Henry wrote: | I own all three. Windows, Mac and Linux...
They all have their advantages and disadvantages... | You cant OWN Windows or Linux ... unless you are Bill Gates or Linus Thorwalds
MfG, MEX
PS: Usually for OS you only get a LICENCE which allows you to use this piece of software 
Of couse you can buy & own a Mac computer ( of which the OS is a part accourding to the argumentation of Apple, which tries to prevent the use of his OS on other hardware not produced by them ).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
chihawk
Clan Blood Spirit
Master Bartender
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 8050
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 11-May-2009 15:54 Post subject: Re: Funny As Hell - 1986 Mac Plus vs. Modern AMD Dual Core |
|
|
| MEX wrote: | | Sir Henry wrote: | I own all three. Windows, Mac and Linux...
They all have their advantages and disadvantages... | You cant OWN Windows or Linux ... unless you are Bill Gates or Linus Thorwalds
MfG, MEX
PS: Usually for OS you only get a LICENCE which allows you to use this piece of software
Of couse you can buy & own a Mac computer ( of which the OS is a part accourding to the argumentation of Apple, which tries to prevent the use of his OS on other hardware not produced by them ). |
There is a language barrier issue here. When Sir Henry says "I own all three. Windows, Mac and Linux... " what he is actually saying is he owns a machine that runs Windows, a machine that runs the MacOS, and a machine that runs Linux.
So you own him an apology for the " "
_________________
www.210sportsblog.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| |
» |
All times are GMT-04:00 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
