| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Delta
Lyran Alliance
Leutnant
Joined: 11-Dec-2004 00:00
Posts: 635
|
 Posted: 04-Jun-2005 21:01 Post subject: The Heavy Gauss Rifle |
  |
|
Whats the deal with the moving firing piloting skill? I mean, you can walk and shoot an artillery piece and not have to take a piloting skill roll but have to with a direct fire cannon?
Who here drops the piloting skill roll for this?
|
|
| Back to top |
 
|
chihawk
Clan Blood Spirit
Master Bartender
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 8052
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 04-Jun-2005 21:04 Post subject: RE: The Heavy Gauss Rifle |
|
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-06-04 21:01, Delta wrote:
Whats the deal with the moving firing piloting skill? I mean, you can walk and shoot an artillery piece and not have to take a piloting skill roll but have to with a direct fire cannon?
Who here drops the piloting skill roll for this?
|
|
Not I.
_________________
www.210sportsblog.com
|
|
| Back to top |
  
|
Warhammer: 3025
Freelance
Captain, AFFC (Ret.)
Joined: 29-Jan-2005 00:00
Posts: 1856
|
| Posted: 04-Jun-2005 21:28 Post subject: RE: The Heavy Gauss Rifle |
|
|
Newton's Third Law: Whenever one body exerts force upon a second body, the second body exerts an equal and opposite force upon the first body.
If you've seen an artillery piece fire, even a short-barreled piece, the barrel recoils, dissipating the effect imparted to the firing platform (in this case, a 'mech).
A Gauss Rifle, however, has no moving parts. All the negative force imparted to the firing platform by the accelerating slug is transferred directly.
At least, that's how my limited understanding of physics reasons out the rule.
_________________
Evil is like a bowl of oranges. Only one, instead, is an orange of DOOM. That orange has a fate to rule over the other oranges with an iron fist. That orange is me.
Because sometimes, there are many guards in the castle.
Ya Rl'yeh!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Sleeping Dragon
Draconis Combine
Tai-i
Joined: 06-Apr-2005 00:00
Posts: 4820
Location: Czech Republic
|
| Posted: 05-Jun-2005 04:05 Post subject: RE: The Heavy Gauss Rifle |
|
|
Recoil on gauss weapons seems strange to me. Standard guns use explosives to fire the projectile, but gauss uses series of magnets, seems like recoil on sling.
_________________
The dragon NEVER sleeps!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Seraph
Blighted Sun Battalion
2nd Company
"Seraph's Slaughter"
Major
Joined: 11-Mar-2004 00:00
Posts: 1744
|
| Posted: 05-Jun-2005 09:04 Post subject: RE: The Heavy Gauss Rifle |
|
|
This topic has been debated with some heat a while back.
_________________
If ignorance is bliss, then why are you so miserable?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
chihawk
Clan Blood Spirit
Master Bartender
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 8052
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 05-Jun-2005 09:51 Post subject: RE: The Heavy Gauss Rifle |
|
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-06-05 09:04, Seraph wrote:
This topic has been debated with some heat a while back.
|
|
And my opinion is unchanged--if you're going to accept the positives of a weapon it's munchy to not accept its negatives.
_________________
www.210sportsblog.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Nightmare
Lyran Alliance
Kommandant-General
Joined: 03-May-2002 00:00
Posts: 2214
|
| Posted: 05-Jun-2005 11:12 Post subject: RE: The Heavy Gauss Rifle |
|
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-06-05 09:51, chihawk wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2005-06-05 09:04, Seraph wrote:
This topic has been debated with some heat a while back.
|
|
And my opinion is unchanged--if you're going to accept the positives of a weapon it's munchy to not accept its negatives.
|
|
Game balance. If some weapon is too good compared to the rest it will unbalance the game. Sure, a Gauss shouldn't have recoil. It shouldn't be limited to 8 shots per ton either, and it should do about a hundred times more damage. Who would want to play the game?
_________________
A tree fall in the forest, and no one is around, and it hits a mime. Does anyone care?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Ruger
Lyran Alliance
Hauptmann General
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 1892
|
| Posted: 05-Jun-2005 12:26 Post subject: RE: The Heavy Gauss Rifle |
|
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-06-05 11:12, Nightmare wrote:
Sure, a Gauss shouldn't have recoil.
|
|
Newton would tend to disagree...even if you are pushing the shell out with magnets, you still have force acting back against the 'Mech...and though the mass might not be great when compared to the 'Mech, the acceleration is the real killer...
Ruger
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Delta
Lyran Alliance
Leutnant
Joined: 11-Dec-2004 00:00
Posts: 635
|
| Posted: 05-Jun-2005 13:23 Post subject: RE: The Heavy Gauss Rifle |
|
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-06-04 21:28, Warhammer: 3025 wrote:
Newton's Third Law: Whenever one body exerts force upon a second body, the second body exerts an equal and opposite force upon the first body.
If you've seen an artillery piece fire, even a short-barreled piece, the barrel recoils, dissipating the effect imparted to the firing platform (in this case, a 'mech).
A Gauss Rifle, however, has no moving parts. All the negative force imparted to the firing platform by the accelerating slug is transferred directly.
At least, that's how my limited understanding of physics reasons out the rule.
|
|
Oh ya. Physics...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Sleeping Dragon
Draconis Combine
Tai-i
Joined: 06-Apr-2005 00:00
Posts: 4820
Location: Czech Republic
|
| Posted: 05-Jun-2005 13:48 Post subject: RE: The Heavy Gauss Rifle |
|
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-06-05 09:04, Seraph wrote:
This topic has been debated with some heat a while back.
|
|
Where?
_________________
The dragon NEVER sleeps!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
chihawk
Clan Blood Spirit
Master Bartender
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 8052
Location: United States
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Delta
Lyran Alliance
Leutnant
Joined: 11-Dec-2004 00:00
Posts: 635
|
| Posted: 06-Jun-2005 13:18 Post subject: RE: The Heavy Gauss Rifle |
|
|
I wonder how munchy a T-Comp and a HGR are... 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
chihawk
Clan Blood Spirit
Master Bartender
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 8052
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 06-Jun-2005 16:43 Post subject: RE: The Heavy Gauss Rifle |
|
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-06-06 13:18, Delta wrote:
I wonder how munchy a T-Comp and a HGR are...
|
|
Well, that TC weighs 4 tons just for the HGR...add a few lasers to that mech and the TC starts getting prohibitive.
_________________
www.210sportsblog.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Ruger
Lyran Alliance
Hauptmann General
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 1892
|
| Posted: 06-Jun-2005 20:37 Post subject: RE: The Heavy Gauss Rifle |
|
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-06-06 16:43, chihawk wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2005-06-06 13:18, Delta wrote:
I wonder how munchy a T-Comp and a HGR are...
|
|
Well, that TC weighs 4 tons just for the HGR...add a few lasers to that mech and the TC starts getting prohibitive.
|
|
5 tons...an Inner Sphere TC is tonnage for direct lasers and ballistics/4...18/4 is 4.2, which rounds up to 5 tons...
Ruger
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Delta
Lyran Alliance
Leutnant
Joined: 11-Dec-2004 00:00
Posts: 635
|
| Posted: 06-Jun-2005 21:02 Post subject: RE: The Heavy Gauss Rifle |
|
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-06-06 20:37, Ruger wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2005-06-06 16:43, chihawk wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2005-06-06 13:18, Delta wrote:
I wonder how munchy a T-Comp and a HGR are...
|
|
Well, that TC weighs 4 tons just for the HGR...add a few lasers to that mech and the TC starts getting prohibitive.
|
|
5 tons...an Inner Sphere TC is tonnage for direct lasers and ballistics/4...18/4 is 4.2, which rounds up to 5 tons...
Ruger
|
|
If your making a mixed tech mech, a Clan TC would weight 3 tons...plus laser tonnage...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
