|
Member Review : 16-Mar-2006 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
BattleMech: |
Sheila SHL-02 |
Rating: |
4.00 |
Comment: |
Trying to keep the Aussies reputation for being tough eh?
Nice brawler, cause that's what it essentially is. Some long range punch before going nuts up close. Hit can be tight, but there's no risk of ammo blowing, so go crazy. |
No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 14-Mar-2006 00:00 |
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
BattleMech: |
Thor (Summoner) M |
Rating: |
4.50 |
Comment: |
Probably the best Standard Summoner variants out there.
Its tough with a flexible weapon mix. Mobility has always been one of the strong points of this design. |
No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 06-Feb-2006 00:00 |
|
1 out of 1 users (100.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
BattleMech: |
Golem GLM-1 |
Rating: |
4.00 |
Comment: |
Good firepower, good armour.
This is an impressive fire support/artillery mech. It's not a slouch up close either.
Excellent fluff. |
No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 05-Feb-2006 00:00 |
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
BattleMech: |
Marauder MAD-XX1 |
Rating: |
3.00 |
Comment: |
Good but boring... very vanilla mech. I'm also a little wary of the XL engine, but it works in this package.
One note.. get better fluff. It's effectively not there right now..
|
No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 05-Feb-2006 00:00 |
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
BattleMech: |
Marauder MAD-XX2 |
Rating: |
2.00 |
Comment: |
Odd design, it no longer resembles a marauder. It's also rather under-armed considering that it has an XL engine. Nice heat sink ability and armour though..
Again.. some fluff please. |
No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 05-Feb-2006 00:00 |
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
BattleMech: |
Marauder MAD-XX3 |
Rating: |
3.50 |
Comment: |
Nice and simple.. not cheap though.
Probably able to give the 3025 Awesome a run for its money. However, it's dead meat against mechs packing longer ranged weapons. A cautious pilot in say a pack hunter could bring this down without a scratch.
Fluff!!! |
No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 31-Jan-2006 00:00 |
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
BattleMech: |
Reaver RVR-01 |
Rating: |
1.00 |
Comment: |
Bleah..
Too few heat sinks for its weapons.. and you can't exactly bracket fire cause they all have similar range.
Ammo sucks, armour sucks, speed sucks.
Just plain bad. |
No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 31-Jan-2006 00:00 |
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
BattleMech: |
Reaver RVR |
Rating: |
2.00 |
Comment: |
Halfway decent with some nice concepts.. it can take the heat from its weapons with some management.
However it's never going to be able ot fire its UACs.. its just too slow..
Armour's also on the light side..
|
No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 31-Jan-2006 00:00 |
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
BattleMech: |
Stalker IIC |
Rating: |
4.00 |
Comment: |
Horrible..
horribly frightening that is.
Heavily armed, armoured. It's also an improvement over the original in every way.. save speed.
Bracket fighters wet dream.. :) |
No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 23-Nov-2005 00:00 |
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
BattleMech: |
Ant-Eater ANT-8R |
Rating: |
4.00 |
Comment: |
Incredibly annoying, fast and well-armoured.
It's not going to kill much, but it's not likely to get killed either.
I recommend industrial quality ear muffs for the pilots though.. |
No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|